The Chelsea midfielder is often compared to his contemporaries, his younger self or 'the player he might have been'. This feature aims to celebrate him in his own right.
Chelsea’s winter purchase of Nemanja Matic has restricted John Obi Mikel to a bit-part role in the Blues’ team. Once again the perennial cliché of how Jose Mourinho destroyed the Nigerian’s attacking instincts in 2006 has come to fore.
The irony of the matter however is the fact that Matic himself was purchased as an attacking midfielder when he initially joined in 2009, but after two league appearances in two years, he switched to Benfica where he was utilised as a defensive midfielder because of his physical qualities. Three years later, Chelsea had to spend a lot to bring him back to replace Mikel.
Much has being said about Mikel’s creative instincts at age grade level, but a logical review of his performances would showcase a player that controlled Nigeria’s midfield in the mould of Xabi Alonso.
An example was the late withdrawal of Mikel when Nigeria was up by a goal against South Korea at the World Youth Championship in 2005. The team lost their balance, and eventually lost the match by conceding two late goals. His return to the team ensured more disciplined midfield performances that almost won the trophy for Nigeria.
Advocates of Mikel’s ‘suppressed attacking instinct’ don’t realise that he managed only one goal at that level, which was a penalty he scored against Switzerland after having his initial effort saved. This fact indicates how, despite his qualities, Mikel was never really the conventional Number 10 people wanted to replace the then-retiring Jay-Jay Okocha. Even at the youth level his best qualities were his architectural building of attacks, deep-lying midfield control, and a good knowledge of reading the game resulting in well-timed tackles and markings.
Buy Cheap Android Phones on Konga.com | Lowest Price in Nigeria
Buy Cheap Android Phones on Konga.com at Lowest price. Free Delivery | Pay on Delivery.
Buy Cheap Android Phones on Konga.com at Lowest price. Free Delivery | Pay on Delivery.
Mikel | Never Okocha
Despite being the initial option for Sir
Alex Ferguson, it is Michael Carrick who has gone on to excel in a
deep-lying role at Manchester United. Mikel hasn’t managed the kind of
controlled midfield play at Chelsea and yet still,
advocates expect Mikel to have played as a creative midfielder if he had
signed for the Old Trafford outfit, also neglecting the obscure careers
of other African players that played for the Red Devils. The
likes of Eric Djemba-Djemba, Manucho Goncalves and Mame Biram Diouf have
all tried and failed to make an impact at United.
This is not an attempt to
berate Mikel’s attacking qualities, but during the tenures of seven
managers at Chelsea, he has largely featured in the holding role.
Only Mourinho and Rafael Benitez really encouraged Mikel to venture
further than the centre of the field.
Largely, his Chelsea career has been
spent covering for the other midfielders and protecting the
defence. Previous national team managers tried to utilise him as an
attacking midfielder, but they all failed until Stephen Keshi gave him
deeper role in the middle. This encouraged the wingers to take the
responsibilities for attacks, while simultaneously allowing space for
Mikel to execute his penetrating passes and occasionally burst forward.
When Mourinho was asked about his
prodigy being utilised in a defensive midfield role during his first
spell at Chelsea, he replied “that is probably the position he is best
suited for.” That statement is enough proof of halting the debate that
has lasted ever since.
Frustrations | Will they continue for Mikel, or can he find a role for himself?
Mourinho, a manager known for
his ‘results first’ approach to football, has had success from all his
teams by utilising players who probably would have being discarded by
other managers. Michael Essien, for example, played at right
back occasionally for Chelsea, Samuel Eto’o was utilised in a right
midfield role at Inter Milan, while under him, right-back Sergio Ramos
thrived in the heart of defence. Frank Lampard’s current relocation in
the heart of midfield is also a result of Mourinho’s tinkering with
player’s natural positions, so too Cesar Azpilicueta’s reinvention as a
left-back.
Needless to say, all of Mikel’s goals
for Chelsea came during the Mourinho Era and his ‘one-on-one’ goal
against Uruguay might have been unheard of under
previous Nigerian managers. Under both Mourinho and Keshi, it is fair to
assume, Mikel is playing under bosses who know how to get the best out
of him.
Mikel has three basic options moving
forward. He either moves to a club suited to his qualities, or he waits,
patiently, to be appreciated at Chelsea, or, finally, he could adapt
his game to suit the needs of his present club side. A contemporary
example is Yaya Toure, but, considering Mikel lacks the Manchester City
man’s mobility, it’s hard to see this kind of reinvention.
Ultimately, Mikel needs to play to his
strengths. If he can make a success of the rest of his career,
marshalling the midfield with calmness and brains, rather than brawn,
and if he can escape the eternal comparison with the Mikel myth, then
Super Eagles fans might be able to celebrate one of their finest sons.
If you have any questions or suggestions feel free to drop your comment in the comment box below.
Follow me on twitter @opecareem
Like Us on Facebook: Facebook.com/ocbvibez
No comments:
Post a Comment
Kindly drop your comments and also follow
Twitter: @opecareem
Instagram: @opecareem